CIRIA C766Mass ConcretePre-pour Simulation
The mechanism

What causes thermal cracking in mass concrete

Three things combine: the concrete generates heat through cement hydration, that heat cannot escape evenly in a thick section, and the resulting temperature gradient generates stress the young concrete cannot yet resist.

Heat of hydration
Cement reacting with water is exothermic. In a thick element the heat cannot escape fast enough, so the core temperature climbs well above ambient and above the surface temperature.
Thermal gradient and restraint
The core stays hot while the surface cools faster, and the cooler outer concrete restrains the expanding core — generating tensile stress that can crack the surface. See thermal cracking in concrete for the full through-section and restrained-base mechanics.
Rapid surface cooling
Stripping forms too early or exposing a hot face to cold air or wind widens the differential quickly and can trigger cracking that a slower, controlled cool-down would have avoided.
The variables

Two variables that matter — not a single pass/fail number

Core-to-surface differential. A differential in the region of 20°C is a commonly used starting point, but it is not a hard boundary. When the hot core expands and the cooler surface restrains it, tensile stress builds at the face — how much stress the section can actually tolerate depends on the mix, section geometry, reinforcement, and restraint conditions, and should be set by the project specification following a CIRIA C766 assessment, not read off as a fixed threshold.

Peak core temperature.A range of roughly 70–75°C is a commonly cited caution point for delayed ettringite formation (DEF) risk, but this is also a starting point rather than an absolute ceiling. BRE Digest and CIRIA guidance note that mixes with a high proportion of GGBS can tolerate meaningfully higher peak temperatures — in some cases well above 80°C — before DEF becomes a practical concern, because GGBS shifts the chemistry that drives DEF onset. That is not a reason to design toward the upper end routinely; it illustrates that the number itself isn't the pass/fail criterion.

In the end, whether a pour cracks is not decided by either number alone. It comes down to how thermal behaviour, restraint, reinforcement, and material properties interact — temperature is one input into that picture, not the whole picture.

Why both matter

Differential drives early surface cracking within days of the pour.

Peak temperaturedrives a longer-term durability risk (DEF) that may not show up until much later in the structure's life.

Both are performance-driven starting points, not hard boundaries — actual crack risk depends on how they interact with restraint, reinforcement, and the specific mix.

Risk factors

What raises the risk in a mass pour

Section thickness
Elements thicker than roughly 500mm–1m hold heat and are the classic mass-concrete risk category — pile caps, raft foundations, transfer slabs, thick mat slabs.
Cement content and type
High-cement, high-early-strength mixes generate more heat, faster, raising both the peak temperature and the rate at which the differential builds.
Ambient conditions
Cold surfaces and wind widen the core-to-surface gap by accelerating surface heat loss; hot weather raises the starting point and the eventual peak.
Restraint conditions
Pours against rock, an existing foundation, or previously cast concrete are restrained and crack more readily as they cool and try to contract.
The toolkit

How to control thermal cracking in mass concrete

MeasureHow it helps
Lower-heat binderGGBS or fly ash to cut peak temperature and slow heat release
Control placement temperatureChilled water, ice, or aggregate cooling to lower the starting temperature
Insulate, don't shockKeep forms on and insulate the surface so the face cools with the core
Stage the pourLift heights and pour sequencing to limit heat build-up and restraint
Simulate before you pourModel peak temperature, differential, and crack risk against the actual mix and geometry before concrete is ordered
Monitor the differential liveEmbedded sensors at core and surface with alerts before the limit is approached

The first four measures reduce the heat generated or slow the gradient before it forms. Pre-pour simulation is what turns those measures from guesswork into a plan with actual certainty behind it — running the mix, geometry, and pour sequence through a thermal model before ordering concrete shows whether the plan holds within limits, rather than finding out after the pour. Live monitoring then catches a developing problem in time to act, which matters because by the time a crack is visible, the intervention window has already passed. See concrete curing temperature for how temperature more broadly drives strength and cracking risk, and concrete thermal control plan for what a documented plan needs to contain.

How ConcreteAI helps

Catch the differential before it cracks

ConcreteAI's Thermal Crack Management solution runs pre-pour simulation of peak temperature, core-to-surface differential, and predicted crack width from the actual mix design, geometry, and pour sequence — so the plan can be adjusted before concrete is ordered. During the pour, SmartHub places sensors at the core and surface and streams the live differential to a web dashboard 24/7, with alerts before the specified limit is approached, while also tracking maturity-based in-place strength from the same sensor data.

A free Simple Thermal Crack Check tool is available for initial screening of a planned pour.

Assess your pour

Planning a mass pour with thermal crack risk?

ConcreteAI's engineering team can run a pre-pour thermal simulation for your specific mix, geometry, and site conditions.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Heat of hydration raises the core temperature of a thick pour while the surface cools faster, creating a temperature differential. The cooler surface restrains the expanding core, building tensile stress that cracks the face once it exceeds the concrete's early-age tensile strength.
A differential in the region of 20°C is a commonly used starting point, but it is not a hard boundary. The differential a section can actually tolerate depends on the mix, geometry, reinforcement, and restraint conditions, and should be set by the project specification following a CIRIA C766 assessment rather than read off as a fixed number.
A range of roughly 70–75°C is a commonly cited caution point for delayed ettringite formation (DEF) risk, but it is a starting point rather than an absolute ceiling. BRE Digest and CIRIA guidance note that mixes with a high proportion of GGBS can tolerate meaningfully higher peak temperatures before DEF becomes a practical concern. This is project- and mix-specific and should be verified against the design basis.
Lower the heat generated with GGBS or fly ash and reduced placement temperature, reduce the gradient by insulating the surface and keeping forms on, manage restraint and lift heights through pour sequencing, and monitor the core-to-surface differential in real time so the team can act before a limit is approached.
Embedded sensors at the core and the surface log temperature continuously; the live differential is tracked against the project's specified limit, with alerts before it is approached so the team can insulate, hold forms, or otherwise intervene.

Spot an error or have feedback on this guide? Let us know.